The election of Barrack Obama is now part of history.
The din has died down and the dust is just settling down. The victors are now busy trying to comprehend the magnitude of the task ahead and the losers in disarray. This post hopes to rationally see this phenomenon and hence a respectable interval from the actual event.
Whilst Obama’s ascendancy to the throne means many things to many people, what has struck me is the exuberance with which Indian bloggers have reacted to this. Further, and quite inexplicably, many have bemoaned our political leadership and the absence of an Obama-esque figure on the Indian horizon. We have a term in financial markets parlance, “Irrational Exuberance” and “Irrational Pessimism”
Our positive response to Obama has been mainly on account of following factors
- His colour. There is always that fantasy of an underdog making it against all odds and an Afro-American in a White dominated USA is a “bang-on” fairy tale script.
- Brilliant packaging, positioning and superb marketing.
- Flawless execution of a very detailed strategy.
- Unfailing magnetic power of rhetoric and oratory.
- Our own ability to be led down the garden path. An Indian disillusioned with our politics is ready to lap up this fairy tale.
Let me not be cussed and ignore what is worth applauding. It speaks volumes that the American society in five short decades has evolved from a society with deep divisions to a stage where a man of mixed parentage is elected to be President of that country.
Let me now turn to our lament on the absence of a Obama like figure in Indian politics and a detailed analysis on how our political leadership falls woefully short of these high standards. My response
First – We are different
We are still evolving from our clan-caste-village-region-state identity to a pan-Indian identity. We are trying to get rid of the shackles of extreme prejudice. We stick to leaders from our clan, caste or region.
We are also an emotional people and very quickly queer the pitch. Our response to anything tends to be irrational and emotional. You only have to watch any debate in Parliament or media to realize what I am saying.
Second – We get the leaders we deserve
Our leaders come from the same pool as we are in.
We conveniently like to believe that we are educated, sophisticated, dignified, cultured, well mannered, fair minded, broad minded, honest, democratic, secular, unifying, well informed and so on. This list of virtues is endless.
With equal convenience we paint all politicians as the exact opposite of what we believe we are and lament at our misfortune. To us a politician is uneducated, boorish, rough, aggressive, loud, ill mannered, narrow minded, dishonest, corrupt, feudal, communal, divisive, biased, ignorant, criminal and anything else that we can think of.
Is this possible???? It is ridiculous to believe this is possible. We get leaders we elect and more importantly deserve.
The fact is when we hold a mirror to ourselves and are honest, we will see shades of what we believe the politician is. The political class is a microcosm of our society at large and is only representative of the values that we stand for.
Now let us for a moment presume that we have found our Obama – who has captured our imagination and can lead us to glory.
If he talks about Hindus – we will label him communal,
If he talks about others – we will accuse him of appeasement and playing vote bank politics
If he talks of rationalizing fuel prices – we will label him anti-poor
If he wants to lower fuel prices – we will accuse him of poor economic sense and fiscal indiscipline.
If he talks of developing Bihar and UP – we will accuse him of favouritism
If he talks of reviving Mumbai – we will criticize him for ignoring the backward areas and their genuine needs.
If he wants to solve the Kashmir issue – we will accuse him of a sell-out and dividing the country
If he wants to act tough in Kashmir – we will accuse him of human rights violations and suppressing the people’s aspirations
If he wants a tough law on terrorism – we will incite the Muslims that this law will be misused against them
If he does not go in for a tough law on terrorism – we will say that we have a weak leader who has no will to take on terrorism.
If he wants to introduce Uniform Civil Code – He is anti-minorities and will divide the nation.
If he is against Uniform Civil Code – He is pro-minorities and not helping a State where law is same for every one.
This leader will be perpetually caught between the Devil and the Deep Sea.
So, Why crib with our present political leadership??...we are not supportive citizens either.